The human evidence is genuinely limited and comes with an important caveat: nearly all of the published studies trace back to Khavinson's research group in Russia, there is no independent Western replication, and a large share of the literature exists only in Russian. The most cited human work is a small trial of 79 cardiovascular patients followed for about 12 years that reported lower overall and cardiovascular mortality, along with other reports in elderly adults and in a degenerative eye condition. Animal data on melatonin, circadian rhythm, and tumor incidence has been described as reasonably consistent, and the proposed mechanism is biologically plausible, but the trials are small, old, and not blinded to modern standards. Anecdotally, users describe the same sleep and recovery improvements the mechanism would predict, though these are self-reports rather than controlled outcomes. The idea is interesting and the follow-up periods are unusually long, but the evidence base is narrow and would need independent replication before it could be called well proven in humans.